A Damaged Steeple, a Polarized Church, and the End of Sola Scriptura
About a week and
a half ago, three significant votes were taken at the biennial Churchwide
Assembly of the ELCA, held in Minneapolis from August 17-23, 2009. MANY
things were voted on, of course, and there was significance to all of it
on some level, but I wanted to draw your attention to the issue that made
the news (front page of many papers, including the LA Times).
A 2/3rds, “supermajority”
vote was required to pass this document, as is required for such statements
of the church. It passed with exactly the number of votes required (676-338),
coming in at 66.67%. Interesting number... During a Bible study and
during some of the debate on the study, a tornado struck “out of nowhere,”
damaging the steeple of Central Lutheran Church (right next door to where
the ELCA was meeting) – twisting the cross and turning it upside down.
Rev. Carl E. Braaten, a truly well known and well-respected Lutheran theologian and teacher, in his address to the Lutheran Coalition for Reform (CORE) conference in October of 2008, even likens this statement to the ancient heresies of Gnosticism (“The word Gnosticism comes from the Greek word ‘gnosis,’ which means ‘knowledge.’ The knowledge in question concerns the secret mystery of life that arises from within the self. The God of Gnosticism is the experiential God identical with what seems most authentic and real in each individual soul”) and Marcionism (“Marcion... was the second century heretic who threw out the Old Testament because it contains the story of God’s creation and the giving of his law – the Ten Commandments. He wanted to keep only a few New Testament books and the sweet honey of the gospel and the love of God. He was a Gnostic. The ELCA draft statement follows in Marcion’s line. It ignores the Old Testament, the doctrine of creation, the Ten Commandments and appeals only to the New Testament gospel of the incarnation and justification by faith. It is so wrong”). http://www.lutherancore.org/pdf/Braaten-critique-of-ELCA.pdf
Elsewhere, Braaten quotes H. Richard Neibuhr’s assessment of the kind of liberal Protestantism that the ELCA is embracing: “A God without wrath brought people without sin into a kingdom without judgment through the ministry of a Christ without a cross.”
Sola Scriptura, Latin for “Only Scripture,” was one of Luther’s foundational teachings. That teaching set him apart from culture and the church of his day, which had co-opted faith and religion, turning the church into little more than a means to control people and extort money from them by means of fear and intimidation. His rediscovery of scripture as the ONLY source of understanding faith and life literally changed the course of the church and of history. Without the scriptures, we would know nothing of the other Solas that Luther discovered: Sola Christus (Christ alone), Sola Gratia (Grace Alone), and Sola Fide (Faith Alone).
Our own church constitution, taken from the ELCA’s Model Constitution, says, “This congregation accepts the canonical Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments as the inspired Word of God and the authoritative source and norm of its proclamation, faith, and life.” And so we do. But the new Sexuality Study deliberately limits the authority of scripture, minimizes and virtually eliminates the concept of Sola Scriptura, and subordinates what the Bible teaches to human reason and experience. Once that was accomplished, the stage was further set for what was inevitably to come next. Nothing could really stop it.
Special Interest Agenda Finally Achieved
“This resolution called upon members to respect the bound consciences of those with whom they disagree; declared the intent to allow structured flexibility in decision-making about candidacy and the call process; eliminated the prohibition of rostered service by members in publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous same-gender relationships; recognized and committed to respect the conviction of members who believe that the ELCA should not call or roster people in committed same-gender relationships; called for development of accountability guidelines; directed that appropriate amendments to ministry policy documents be drafted and approved by the Church Council; and urged that this church continue to trust congregations, bishops, synods and others responsible for determining who should be called into public ministry.”So... churches would be allowed to decide on an individual basis whether or not to call someone in a “publicly accountable, livelong, monogamous, same-gender relationship to serve as pastor... We’ll see... Already those who support that agenda are chaffing because there might be churches that refuse to call them based on their newly approved sexuality.
“Bound consciences” is an interesting phrase. What does it mean? I wish I were joking, but there’s going to be another study to determine what that means... I THINK it attempts to echo Luther, standing before the Diet at Worms, refusing to recant because his conscience was bound... But his was bound to the scriptures, not to personal bias or preference, and certainly not to special interest groups or political agendas. “Unless I can be instructed and convinced with evidence from the Holy Scriptures or with open, clear and distinct grounds and reasoning – and my conscience is captive to the Word of God – then I cannot and will not recant, because it is neither safe nor wise to act against conscience. Here I stand. I can do no other. God Help me! Amen.”
Again, this is all about Scripture and our understanding of it as it relates to the church. Attempts to interpret what conservative pastors and lay people say on this as being anti-gay people is spurious, duplicitous, and, well, doesn’t respect our “bound consciences.” All are welcome, all receive ministry, forgiveness is proclaimed to all who repent. Changing approved practice and ignoring clear scripture to accommodate ANYONE’s lifestyle who is offended by scripture is not right. What if this had been done throughout history? What would be left of scripture? What has happened to the church and the gospel when this does happen?
I am here trying to give you my take on the events that have recently transpired in the church. I have followed them closely for literally decades. While I’m neither a Luther scholar nor professional theologian, I am a conservative pastor who understands and respects the Scriptures as the basis for how Christians are to live and how the church conducts itself in the world. This statement and the resultant resolutions approving “publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous same-gender relationships” literally changes everything, fundamentally altering church custom and practice for clergy, changing the way the church understands and reads scripture, and will radically alter our ecumenical connections with most other churches throughout the world. This is in no way an overstatement...
With Conscience firmly
bound and captive,
A link to the ELCA’s
revised document is here: http://www.elca.org/What-We-Believe/Social-Issues/Social-Statements-in-Process/JTF-Human-Sexuality.aspx